THE MEANING OF PRODUCTIVITY
   - (PRODUCTIVITY RE-DEFINED)  
    FNF: THE MEANING OF PRODUCTIVITY - (PRODUCTIVITY RE-DEFINED)   http://www.hi.is/~joner/eaps/wh_meprr.htm  
 

...

The meaning of productivity  (GO)


"Realizing that
- the meaning of productivity
has evolved
- from the relationship between input and output


-  to the, improvement of quality of life for all people in response to
   such global issues as
   - the environment, poverty,
     and regional imbalance in development;
"

See the full original at: http://www.apo-tokyo.org/speceven/arc0007declare.htm
REF: The IPC Declaration  (GO)

International Productivity Conference 2001 (GO)

2-4 October 2001, Shangri-La Hotel, Singapore
http://www.apo-tokyo.org/speceven/arc0007add_sg.htm

" The meaning of productivity has evolved over the years from simply producing quality products at minimum cost to include the improvement of all the factors of development for a better quality of life for the people. " http://www.psb.gov.sg/news/releases/01_02_13.html
http://www.psb.gov.sg/news/pd/2001_07/cover_01.html
Mr Lim Boon Heng  GO_Mr Lim Boon Heng http://www.cabinet.gov.sg/limbh.htm

Q-LIST
http://www.humanityquest.com/topic/FAQ/index.asp?theme1=productivity





FNF: HOW MUCH IS ENOUGH? - The End of Economic Growth?    http://www.hi.is/~joner/eaps/wh_enog.htm    2002-01-08  
Scott Sink
 GO IG     LJ  GS    DEF    TL  RE  CB

 

.

 

  THE MEANING OF PRODUCTIVITY 
   FNF: THE MEANING OF PRODUCTIVITY - (PRODUCTIVITY RE-DEFINED)   http://www.hi.is/~joner/eaps/wh_dropv.htm 
   FNF:  Leitartafla JE/UH  - Útskýringar á skammstöfunum http://www.hi.is/~joner/eaps/lt.htm      2002-01-08     wn (GO)
GO IPC Declaration  DEF
GO Productivity Council  DEF
GO International Productivity Council  DEF
GO meaning of productivity  DEF
GO productivity  DEF
GO productivity defined  DEF
GO definition of productivity  DEF
GO definitions of productivity  DEF
GO educational productivity  DEF   

 

 

 

Bureau of Labor Statistics   http://www.bls.gov/bls/infohome.htm

"How is productivity defined?

Productivity is a measure of economic efficiency

which shows how effectively economic inputs are converted into output.


Why is productivity measurement important?


Advances in productivity, that is the ability to produce more with the same or less input, are a significant source of increased potential national income. The U.S. economy has been able to produce more goods and services over time, not by requiring aproportional increase of labor time, but by making production more efficient.

How is productivity measured by BLS?

Productivity is measured by comparing the amount of goods and services produced with the inputs which were used in production. Labor productivity is the ratio of the output of goods and services to the labor hours devoted to the production of that output.

What is the most commonly used productivity measure?


Output per hour of all persons
--labor productivity--is the most commonly used productivity measure. Labor is an
easily-identified input to virtually every production process. For the U.S. business sector, labor cost represents about two-thirdsof the value of output produced.

Are industry productivity measures available for separate regions, states, and cities in the United States?


No. Productivity measures are only available at the national level. BLS productivity measures are based on aggregate national measures of outputs and inputs. These data sources do not provide the information BLS would need to construct regional, or state measures.

What are "unit labor costs"?


Unit labor costs are calculated by dividing total labor compensation by real output or --- equivalently ---- by dividing hourly compensation by productivity.

That is, unit labor costs = total labor compensation / real output ; or equivalently,

unit labor cost = hourly compensation / productivity
= [total labor compensation / hours] / [output / hours]

Thus, increases in productivity lower unit labor costs while increases in hourly compensation raise them. If both series move  equally, unit labor costs will be unchanged.

Last modified: October 16, 2001
"

http://www.bls.gov/lpc/peoplebox.htm

 

" The inherent inefficiency of U.S. colleges and universities was the
subject of a recent essay in the New York Times by Kenneth Shaw
and Dan Black of Syracuse University. The essay linked the steady
increase in college costs to so-called Baumol’s disease, an
institutional affliction named for William J. Baumol, a New York
University economist.
Baumol theorizes that unlike manufacturing
widgets, where productivity often reduces costs, educating
students is a labor-intensive process, where costs will always go
up.
Hiring and retaining excellent faculty (not to mention
purchasing the latest technology and offering great academic and
extracurricular programs) is never offset by increased productivity.
Bates, where a guiding ethos will always be close student-faculty
interaction, can only educate about 1,650 "customers" every year.
"

See the full original at:
http://www.bates.edu/x13980.xml
http://www.econ.nyu.edu/dept/vitae/baumol.htm
http://cepa.newschool.edu/het/profiles/baumol.htm
http://www.nyu.edu/fas/Faculty/BaumolWilliam.html
http://allthingswilliam.com/economy.html
http://pup.princeton.edu/titles/7310.html

 

"The Free-Market Innovation Machine: Analyzing the Growth Miracle of Capitalism 

William J. Baumol
 GO IG  

Cloth | May 2002 | $35.00 / £24.95  300 pp.

Why has capitalism produced economic growth that so vastly dwarfs the growth record of other economic systems, past and present?
Why have living standards in countries from
America to Germany to Japan risen exponentially over the past century?

William Baumol rejects the conventional view that capitalism benefits society through
price competition--that is,
products and services become less costly as firms vie for consumers.

Where most others have seen this as the driving force behind growth, he sees something different

--a compound of systematic innovation activity within the firm,
- an arms race in which no firm in an innovating industry
  dares to fall behind the others
  in new products and processes,
- and inter-firm collaboration in the creation and use of
  innovations.


While giving price competition due credit, Baumol stresses that large firms use innovation as a prime competitive weapon.
However, as he explains it, firms do not wish to risk too much innovation, because it is costly, and can be made obsolete by rival innovation.

So firms have split the difference through the sale of technology licenses and participation in technology-sharing compacts that pay huge dividends to the economy as a whole--and thereby
made innovation a routine feature of economic life.

This process, in Baumol's view, accounts for the unparalleled growth of modern capitalist economies. Drawing on extensive research and years of consulting work for many large global firms, Baumol shows in this original work that the capitalist growth process, at least in societies where the rule of law prevails, comes far closer to the requirements of economic efficiency than is typically understood."

See the full original at:
http://pup.princeton.edu/titles/7310.html

GO_Free-Market Innovation Machine

 

"William Baumol is one of those rare economists whose principles
have been borne out in the working world. His principle, known as
Baumol’s Disease, says that
because productivity in service
sector jobs tends to lag behind productivity in manufacturing, the
costs in service related businesses end up rising over time.
The
underlying assumption is that nominal wages equalize across
sectors so that lower productivity growth shows up as relatively
faster growth of prices. Hence, you arrive at Baumol’s cost
disease — the increasing cost of outputs from low-productivity
sectors."

See the full original at:
http://www.cost-quality.com/restpast/v7i1a8.html

Baumol’s Disease (GO)
William Baumol  GO IG     LJ  GS    DEF    TL  RE  CB



Baumol's cost disease

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Baumol's cost disease (also known as the Baumol Effect) is a phenomonon discovered by William J. Baumol and William G. Bowen in the 1960s.

The original study was conducted for the performing arts sector. Baumol and Bowen pointed the same number of musicians are needed to play a Beethoven string quartet today as were needed in the 1800's; that is, the productivity of Classical music performance has not increased.

In a range of businesses, such as the car manufacturing sector and the retail sector, workers are continually getting more productive due to technological innovations to their tools and equipment.

In contrast, in some labor-intensive sectors that rely heavily on human interaction or activities, such as nursing, education, or the performing arts there is little or no growth in productivity over time.

As with the string quartet example, it takes nurses the same amount of time to change a bandage, or college professors the same amount of time to mark an essay, in 2006 as it did in 1966.

Baumol's cost disease is often used to describe the lack of growth in productivity in public services such as public hospitals and state colleges.

The desirable range of student-teacher or patient-nurse ratios puts a limit on the increase of productivity. To lower the price of education or hospital care, one would have to lower the quality of the service provided.

Since many public administration activities are heavily labor-intensive, there is little growth in productivity over time.
As a result, the costs of the bureaucracy will inflate quicker than the growth in the GDP.

 

References

Views
Personal tools
Navigation
Toolbox
In other languages

Material from WIKIPEDIA:   "This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License, which means that you can copy and modify it as long as the entire work (including additions) remains under this license"   http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html      Jón Erlendsson 2006
See also Wikipedia   Creative Commons    Open Access Publishing    Open Content   Open Source  E-Books JE-Excellence