|
|
...
|
|
LECTURES:
Originally a method for copying boks!
|
|
"The
practice of giving lectures
started when books were rare and expensive.
At least one of the main purposes then was to
"transmit" information from the books the lecturer owned
or had read to the notebooks of students who could not
have easy access to the books. "
"Sadly, some lectures still seem to continue the tradition of
information transfer, by students copying down what
lecturers show them on screens or overheads
and writing down things that lecturers say.
This always was, and still is, very slow."
The Lecture: A Medieval "invention"
-that remains quite unchanged today!
|
"Basically, medieval
university instruction was done by a lecture method.
The word lecture is derived from the Latin and means to read.
Before the development of the printing press in the fifteenth century,
- books were expensive, and few
students could afford them, so masters read from a text
(...) and then added commentaries, which came to be known as
glosses (Spiel. 356)."
|
|
See the full original at: http://socsci.gc.cc.fl.us/rbaldwin/new_page_2.htm
|
|
"Now, however, we are beginning to
recognize that our dominant paradigm mistakes a means for an end.
It takes the means or method-called "instruction" or "teaching"-and
makes it the college's end or purpose.
To say that the purpose of colleges is to provide instruction
- is like saying that General Motors' business is to operate assembly lines
- or that the purpose of medical care is to fill hospital beds.
We now see that our mission is not
instruction
- but rather that of producing learning with every student
by whatever means work best."
See the full original at: http://www.belmont.edu/Humanities/Philosophy/courses/philinquiryf98/barrtagg.html
P: FNF: LECTURES: ORIGINALLY A METHOD FOR "COPYING
BOOKS"! http://www.hi.is/~joner/eaps/wh_lepp.htm
|
|
See the full original at: http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/careers/story/0,9856,620225,00.html
(GOOD!)
http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/
GOOD-WEB!
|
|
What is the use of lectures? (GO)
"Bligh (1998) found that lectures are ineffective
compared with other methods to promote thought.
This is because most other methods involve student activity rather than just listening.
Discussion has been
consistently proved to be more effective than lectures in getting students to think.
Siegel et al (1963)
made independent measures of students learning where he found that during the
lectures 36.8% of
the time was spent in passive thoughts about the subject and thoughts
evidencing simple
comprehension, compared with 20.3% during discussion. 31% of lectures were spent
with irrelevant
thoughts, compared with 14.5% during discussions. During discussions the students spent
8.3% of the
time attempting to solve problems and to synthesise information, compared with 1.0% during
lectures.
All these comparisons suggest that during
discussion students are more attentive, active and
thoughtful than during lectures."
http://www.gla.ac.uk/services/tls/STAFF/ras/ELPwebpage/papers/report_no1.pdf
(GOOD!!)
Why We Must Change: The Research Evidence
GO_Why
We Must Change:The Research Evidence
http://www.wmueller.com/home/papers/refnow.html
http://www.neo-tech.com/finalevo/evo-030.html
http://www.byu.edu/sasslink/pdf/67_3/hermana.pdf
FNF: The Lecture Method http://www.hi.is/~joner/eaps/lectx.htm
|
(C) Jón Erlendsson 2002-01-02
() VS: 525.4666 (-5) Námsnet
HÍ
ww_b555
|
|